Tausczik, Y. R., and you may Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and you can computerized text message research strategies. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 29, 24–54. doi: 927X09351676
Tay, Y., Tuan, L. An effective., and you will Hui, S. C. (2018). “CoupleNet: Enjoying Couples with Coupled Interest for Relationships Testimonial,” inside the Proceedings of the Twelfth International AAAI Conference towards the Online and you will Social networking, (Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Force).
Toma, C. L., and D’Angelo, J. D. (2017). “Hooking up profile-to-profile: how some body care about-expose and you may setting impressions off others by way of internet dating profiles,” throughout the Impact out of Social network from inside the Modern Personal Matchmaking, eds N. Yards. Punyanunt-Carter and J. S. Wrench (Lanham, MD: Lexington), 147–162.
Toma, C. L., and Hancock, J. T. (2011). “A different Twist with the Love’s Work: Self-Speech for the Dating Pages”, in Computers-Mediated Telecommunications for the Individual Relationship, eds K. B. Wright and you will L. Meters. Webb (New york, NY: Peter Lang), 41–55.
Van Berlo, Z., and you may Ranzini, G. (2018). “Huge Relationship: a good Computational Way of Take a look at Gendered Self-Presentation on the Tinder,” for the Legal proceeding of your own 9th Globally Appointment on the Social network and Community (Nyc, NY: ACM), 390–394. doi: 951
Van den Bosch, Good., Busser, Grams. J., Daelemans, W., and you will Canisius, S. (2007). “A powerful thoughts-depending morphosyntactic tagger and you can parser having Dutch,” for the Chosen Files of one’s 17th Computational Linguistics on Netherlands Fulfilling, eds F. van Eynde, P. Dirix, I. Schuurman, and you can V. Vandeghinste (Leuven, BE: CLIN), 99–114.
Van der Lee, C., and you may Van den Bosch, A beneficial. (2017). “Investigating lexical and you can syntactic provides to own vocabulary range personality,” when you look at the Proceedings of one’s 4th Workshop towards NLP for similar Languages, Types and you may Languages (Stroudsburg, PA: ACL Anthology), 190–199. doi: 3/v1/W17-1224
Van der Zanden, T., Mos, Yards., and Schouten, Good. (2018). Taalaccommodatie during the on the internet datingprofielen: effecten van opleidingsniveau dentro de sorts of datingsite op taalgebruik [Words hotel when you look at the dating users: effects of education peak and kind out of dating internet site towards vocabulary use]. Tijdschr. Taalbeheers. forty, 83–106. doi: /TVT2018.step 1.zand
Van Wissen, L., and you can Footwear, P. (2017). “An electronic digital Interpretation of your LIWC Dictionary for the Dutch,” in the Electronic Lexicography in the 21st Century: Legal proceeding away from eLex 2017 Appointment (Brno: Lexical Measuring CZ), 703–715.
Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective care about-presentation from inside the computers-mediated interaction: hyperpersonal size of technology, words, and you can cognitionput. Hum. Behav. 23, 2538–2557. doi: /j.chb.
Weidman, An excellent. C., Cheng, J. T., Chisholm, C., and you can Tracy, J. L. (2015). Are she the only? Identification judgments out of on the web personal advertising. Pers. Relatsh. 22, 591–603. doi: /pere.12097
Whitty, Meters. T. (2008). Discussing brand new ‘real’ myself, seeking the latest ‘actual’ you: presentations out-of notice toward an internet dating siteput. People Behav. 24, 1707–1723. doi: /j.chb farmers dating sites Italy.
Wotipka, C. D., and you will Highest, An excellent. C. (2016). An enthusiastic idealized notice and/or actual myself? Forecasting interest in order to matchmaking users having fun with selective mind-presentation and you will warrantingmun. Monogr. 83, 281–302. doi: 041
The language data system LIWC could have been widely used to your examination of consciously and you can unconsciously lead linguistic features in most manner of texts (Tausczik and Pennebaker, 2010), and you will has also been utilized for these analyses of age, gender, and you will (dis)honesty during the dating users (e
Yarkoni, T. (2010). Personality when you look at the a hundred,100 conditions: a huge-size study away from identification and you can word play with among writers. J. Res. Pers. forty-two, 363–373. doi: /j.jrp.
Citation: van der Zanden T, Schouten AP, Mos Meters, van der Lee C and you can Krahmer E (2019) Outcomes of Relationship Goal to your Linguistic Choices inside the Online dating Users: A multiple-Means Means. Frontmun. 4:twenty two. doi: /fcomm.dos
Copyright laws © 2019 van der Zanden, Schouten, Mos, van der Lee and Krahmer. This can be an open-supply blog post delivered in regards to this new Imaginative Commons Attribution License (CC By). The employment, shipments or reproduction in other forums is actually allowed, given the first writer(s) therefore the copyright laws owner(s) is credited and that the initial publication contained in this record is actually quoted, prior to recognized educational habit. No have fun with, distribution otherwise breeding is permitted and therefore will not comply with these types of conditions.
So you’re able to check out the whether or not linguistic behavior is actually influenced by on the web daters’ dating goals, a couple of additional desktop-founded text message investigation measures are employed in today’s investigation. Earliest, that with a theoretic driven strategy, i select linguistic properties one to ong reputation citizens selecting an excellent long-label or everyday matchmaking. This new Linguistic Inquiry and Keyword Amount program (LIWC; Pennebaker et al., 2015) was then always instantly analyze several,310 users based on an effective Dutch dating internet site. At the same time, i play with a document-determined method of next pull stuff-certain enjoys which can be used so you’re able to categorize texts of a few relationship trying communities. Such as this, this new officially postulated linguistic differences when considering the 2 sets of profile texts we take a look at are able to develop feel verified, in addition to explore whether you can find additional linguistic differences maybe not grabbed by the first strategy. Properly, the following goal of the research should be to dictate as to what extent a data-determined keyword-established classifier contributes to a technique instance LIWC whenever textually checking out online dating reputation messages. Playing with one another steps may be productive having getting a slimmer-grained and more full image of linguistic differences between reputation texts compiled by those with a lot of time-title and you can informal relationship goals.
grams., Bridegroom and Pennebaker, 2005; Toma and Hancock, 2012; Davis and you can Fingerman, 2016). LIWC is founded on the belief you to if you’re creating, the usage brand of terms and conditions provides understanding on the writers’ linguistic and you may mental processes as well as their mental claims. The text regarding character texts presumably and bring information you to reveals more info on intentions and needs away from daters, as well as examined right here. While the LIWC will bring a great deal of (generally thematic) linguistic classes on what texts try analyzed, below specific hypotheses are built regarding your questioned differences in words access to enough time-label and relaxed relationship seekers to your extremely related ones classes.
Regardless of if education emphasizing code include in dating profile messages provides used LIWC (e.g., Toma and you can Hancock, 2012; Davis and Fingerman, 2016), brand new lexicon’s viability to your domain has had nothing respect. It can be the case you to LIWC doesn’t safeguards brand new content-certain keeps that are specifically associated and you may common amongst internet dating reputation messages. Relationship profiles shall be rather noisy; he could be out-of casual nature and you may authored by a very diverse society, that do never adhere to standard words conventions (Van der Zanden ainsi que al., 2018). Furthermore, LIWC offer a wide direction towards the design, build therefore the extent that emotional processes out-of purposes are mirrored inside matchmaking pages, however, reveals nothing about and that content-particular have are extremely distinctive getting profile texts out-of much time-title and you will casual matchmaking hunters. Possibly, variations in words play with between them relationships trying to organizations manifest on their own not so much in the terms and conditions caught of the greater LIWC groups, but rather in the usage of variety of articles-particular provides, in which profile citizens are able to use version of terms or term combos one to are considered becoming important in a profile text.
Word-Centered Classifier
The new authors declare that the research is actually conducted about absence of any commercial otherwise monetary dating that might be construed once the a potential conflict of great interest.