The information showed is actually collected during the framework away from broader look strategies, and that consisted of a detailed sociodemographic and you will matchmaking investigations, as well as other scales in extent of personal relationship
With regards to the overall lifetime of the partnership, an average, in years, with the various other statuses explained was, respectively: dos.89 (SD = 2.27); cuatro.94 (SD = 2.97), one another teams different ranging from half a year and you can eleven years of matchmaking; 7.76 (SD = cuatro.01), ranging from one or two and 19 ages; and (SD = cuatro.82), between less than per year and you may 31 many years. 8%) and you may existed that have family members, if you’re people living with its lovers have been generally functioning somebody (69.2%), at which 53% got college otherwise postgraduate levels. Of the formal partnership participants, 67% got school otherwise blog post-graduate amounts, where 89.8% have been functioning, 2% retired and you may 8.2% out of work. The functional state into the married professionals is actually equivalent: 89.5% have been functioning, 2.9% was indeed retired and you may six.3% have been unemployed, and step one.3% referred another a position updates. Inside class, 62.5% of one’s players had school otherwise postgraduate amount.
Individual union is evaluated with respect to the Portuguese adaptation (Desk step one) of your own smaller version of brand new Persistence Measure (Stanley, 1986), that has been translated with respect to the pursuing the translation and retroversion methods: just after permission gotten because of the publisher, the first level are interpreted by a couple specialists in industry, both these translations were confronted with retroversion from the two pros, that bilingual and something experienced in the aid of the fresh new English language; fundamentally, for each version was versus modern size, opting for the usage the newest words and circumstances having better distance in order to they. The latest Portuguese variation for this reason consisted of the brand new 14 brand-new products and you may the same address level and you will are named, immediately following deliberation because of the class, the private Commitment Level (‘Escala de- Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). For the latest phase of the interpretation procedure, the brand new means are given to three members for the purpose of verifying the adequateness of code therefore the unambiguous understanding of the things escort service Woodbridge, which have been discussed toward users once applying of brand new questionnaire. Since there were zero comments saying or even, the things remained a comparable.
As a consequence of an improve of the original Davis (1996, cited in Lind, 2008) size, which device is meant to scale relationship top quality perception, with the hope one, with respect to the theoretical assumptions, each other bills will absolutely correlate
Relationship Quality, chosen to verify criteria validity, was measured with the Relationship Rating Form–Revised (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt. by Lind, 2008). The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.